LETTER: UPD Officer had the option of non-lethal force

Dear Editor:

Other non-lethal options were available to Officer Duplain, evenif he had not been informed of them. As a former Ball StateUniversity student and former Indiana Department of Correctionscorrections officer, I want to attest to the fact that OfficerDuplain did have less-than-lethal-force options available tohim.

Where was his baton? Where was his Maglite flashlight that couldhave been used as a baton to disable Mr. McKinney without takinghis life? I find it difficult to believe that an officer would gobehind a house at night in the dark without his flashlight but withhis gun drawn. I think that would constitute absolute negligence onthe part of the officer.

By allowing Officer Duplain on the street, riding alone onpatrol with a minimum amount of training and putting him in asituation where he was destined to fail, I personally feel that theUPD was negligent. I will say that my thoughts and prayers are withthe McKinney family. I encourage them to file a wrongful-death suitagainst the University Police Department because I think it wasinadequacies of departmental training that led to their son's deathat the hands of one of the UPD officers.

Bill Craig

alumnus

 

 

 


Comments

More from The Daily






This Week's Digital Issue


Loading Recent Classifieds...