Now that the investigation of the University Police officer who shot and killed Michael McKinney while on patrol is complete, a new issue has surfaced.
Tim McKinney, Michael McKinney's father, has asked Ball State to not allow its officers to carry guns. He said that Ball State students do not pose enough of a threat to warrant the campus police's use of guns.
Doug McConkey, vice president of student affairs, said that removing guns from the force will make UPD's job more difficult, as they will have to rely more on the efforts of Muncie Police.
Ball State University Police officers reserve the rights of any other police officer. They must have a way to defend themselves while on patrol; therefore, they should be allowed to remain armed despite this incident.
The answer instead lies in proper training and discretion.
Thankfully, Muncie and Ball State's campus do not often see situations where gunfire is necessary. However, if an issue that demands the use of this force does arise, Ball State police need to be equipped to properly handle the situation.
Officers should use intense discretion while using guns. They should remain equipped with items like mace or a nightstick to allow them more options. These items can be used for defense, but will not cause as severe injuries if used correctly.
Police officers equip themselves with weapons because they need to be ready to handle any situation. When a violent event occurs, officers must be prepared to protect the suspect, civilians and themselves.
If guns are taken from Ball State police and an event occurs where their use is necessary, the consequences could be more dangerous. When police officers are trained to use each weapon option carefully and correctly, Muncie and Ball State are better served.
Police officers need defense options, including guns. However, carrying a gun should not be the only option.