This letter ran in Tuesday's edition of the Daily News. An editing error caused its meaning to change. Here it is again in full.
Dear Editor,
Mike Pike is only partially correct in "U.S. Constitution based on Christianity." The similarities between the U.S. Constitution and the ideals of Christianity do not exist because the Constitution is based on Christian ideals but because both the Constitution and Christianity emanate from the same Source. That Christianity claims the Creator of the Universe as its God is not a valid reason to suggest that any system of belief that recognizes the supremacy of the Creator of the Universe is necessarily Christian. For example, the government of the United States shares many fundamental principles with other forms of government around the globe. Yet, no one would suggest that these governments are necessarily American.
By definition, Christianity is exclusive. It allows for peaceful coexistence with other religions but will not allow the practice of other forms of religion within a Christian context. The First Amendment is inherently pluralistic. The Free Exercise clause impliedly recognizes Christianity as only one of many possible expressions of man's relationship to the Creator, and any group of Americans is free to "establish" that form of expression for the members of that group. However, the Establishment Clause ensures that all forms of religious expression (or non-expression) co-exist peaceably and on an equal footing within the American context by prohibiting federal and state legislatures (by application of the Fourteenth Amendment) from establishing any singular form of religious expression for the entire nation.
Our chosen form of government is pluralistic in that it attempts to peaceably co-exist with other forms of government that govern by the consent of the governed. But we will not allow any other form of government to be practiced within the territorial limits of the United States of America. This is the paradigm that the Constitution imposes on religious expression with the United States of America. Efforts to separate religion from government will necessarily result in conflict because of the strong links between the two. The conflict lies in the inability of some to differentiate between "public religion" defined by Madison as the obligation all men owe to the Creator, and "private religion" which refers to the particular form in which citizens decide to express that obligation either as individuals or in concert with other like-minded citizens.
Darius A. Lecointe, J.D., Ph.D.
Research Design Consultant
University Computing Services, RB 237
Ball State University
5-9106++2'-¦a--~
o_letter_2.25DNEditorial++2SORT.+â-ä2AUDT
Read More
Three Air Jam teams take home the win
October 12, 2012Nineteen teams shimmied, shook and flipped for a sold out John R. Emens Auditorium on Thursday night during the 25th annual Air Jam.
Bill Clinton Speaks at North Central High School
October 12, 2012Former President's Speech Could Have Effect on State Senate Race
