Representation

At Issue: Students should be allowed to have a lawyer present at disciplinary hearings

A University Senate meeting caused a debate that should be the concern of every student.

Though legislation surrounding Ball State's disciplinary system did not pass, it still raises questions about its procedures.

The legislation would amend the current Code of Student Rights and Responsibilities, which explains punishments for code violations.

The amendment would create parallel procedures between the discipline hearings of Recreation Services, Housing and Residence Life, dean of students and Student Organizations and Activities offices.

Supporters of the legislation argued that students could go to one office, not four. They also said the legislation could prevent double jeopardy.

More important to the students should be the question of having a lawyer present.

Some professors objected to a provision that would allow students' lawyers to attend disciplinary hearings, which they can do under the current code.

However, the students' testimonies could be used later in court.

Thus, students should be allowed to have their lawyer present. Often, students are unaware of their rights and hire lawyers to advise them. A testimony given without legal counsel present is nearly equal to interrogating people without advising them of their Miranda rights.

If a situation did warrant court intervention, a student would want a lawyer present from the beginning of the proceedings.

According to student Senator Joe Flores, the lawyer would not be able to speak at the hearings.

If a student is being questioned for a violation of policy, he or she should be allowed representation.

The Constitution gives that right to every citizen, whether he or she can afford counsel or not.

There is no reason for the university to be an exception, especially if court proceedings are a possible outcome of the hearings.


Comments

More from The Daily






This Week's Digital Issue


Loading Recent Classifieds...