Dear Editor,
If SGA presidential candidate Nick Loving's Feb. 13 "Your Turn" column was intended to prove his slate's integrity, it fell short of its mark.
Nowhere in the column did Loving accept any responsibility for mistakes made or misunderstandings by him and his slate.
Instead of being a leader and acting responsibly, he played the victim and wrote off his slate's actions as the completely innocent actions of a targeted group.-รก
The remainder lapsed into the print equivalent of a fluffy campaign ad -- the reader is left back where he or she started, without any solid information about the so-called "integrity" of the slate.
Compared with Jayson Manship's missive, which read as an earnest attempt to clarify quotes and statements previous published, Loving's column seemed overly self-aware and pushy.
My advice? If Nick Loving and his slate are trying to clarify any alleged or actual transgressions, they need to accept some responsibility. No one wants a victim for a leader. Furthermore, save the slate-glorifying spiel for the debates, where it belongs.
Amanda Goings
senior
Read More
Three Air Jam teams take home the win
October 12, 2012Nineteen teams shimmied, shook and flipped for a sold out John R. Emens Auditorium on Thursday night during the 25th annual Air Jam.
Bill Clinton Speaks at North Central High School
October 12, 2012Former President's Speech Could Have Effect on State Senate Race
